Home Emotional effects Messaging strategies for communicating health-related information in social media—a content and effectiveness analysis of organ donation posts on Instagram in Germany | BMC Public Health

Messaging strategies for communicating health-related information in social media—a content and effectiveness analysis of organ donation posts on Instagram in Germany | BMC Public Health

by Celina Bade
0 comments
  • Lewis A, Koukoura A, Tsianos G-I, Gargavanis AA, Nielsen AA, Vassiliadis E. Organ donation in the US and Europe: the supply vs demand imbalance. Transplant Rev (Orlando). 2021;35:100585.

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Linden PK. History of solid organ transplantation and organ donation. Crit Care Clin. 2009;25(1):165–84.

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • DeRoos LJ, Zhou Y, Marrero WJ, Tapper EB, Sonnenday CJ, Lavieri MS, et al. Assessment of national organ donation rates and organ procurement organization metrics. JAMA Surg. 2021;156:173–80. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamasurg.2020.5395.

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Council of Europe. International figures on donation and transplantation. https://human-rights-channel.coe.int/organ-donation-en.html. Accessed 28 June 2022.

  • Nadel MS, Nadel CA. Using reciprocity to motivate organ donations. Yale J Health Policy Law Ethics. 2005;5(1):293–327.

    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Vanholder R, Domínguez-Gil B, Busic M, Cortez-Pinto H, Craig JC, Jager KJ, et al. Organ donation and transplantation: a multi-stakeholder call to action. Nat Rev Nephrol. 2021;17:554–68. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41581-021-00425-3.

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Arshad A, Anderson B, Sharif A. Comparison of organ donation and transplantation rates between opt-out and opt-in systems. Kidney Int. 2019;95:1453–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.kint.2019.01.036.

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Abadie A, Gay S. The impact of presumed consent legislation on cadaveric organ donation: a cross-country study. J Health Econ. 2006;25(4):599–620.

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Madden S, Collett D, Walton P, Empson K, Forsythe J, Ingham A, et al. The effect on consent rates for deceased organ donation in Wales after the introduction of an opt-out system. Anaesthesia. 2020;75:1146–52. https://doi.org/10.1111/anae.15055.

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Shepherd L, O’Carroll RE, Ferguson E. An international comparison of deceased and living organ donation/transplant rates in opt-in and opt-out systems: a panel study. BMC Med. 2014;12:131. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12916-014-0131-4.

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Organspende-info. https://www.organspende-info.de/zahlen-und-fakten/statistiken.html#:~:text=2020%20gab%20es%20bundesweit%20913,38%2C0%20Organspenderinnen%20und%20Organspender. Accessed 21 Feb 2022.

  • Global Observatory on Donation and Transplantation. http://www.transplant-observatory.org/export-database/. Accessed 30 May 2022.

  • Scholz N. Organ donation and transplantation: facts, figures and European Union action; EPRS: European Parliamentary Research Service. Belgium. 2020. Retrieved from https://policycommons.net/artifacts/1337208/organ-donation-and-transplantation/1944888/.

  • Terbonssen T, Settmacher U, Wurst C, Dirsch O, Dahmen U. Attitude towards organ donation in German medical students. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2016;401:1231–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-016-1482-4.

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Morgan SE, Miller JK. Beyond the organ donor card: the effect of knowledge, attitudes, and values on willingness to communicate about organ donation to family members. Health Commun. 2002;14:121–34. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327027HC1401_6.

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Friedersdorff F, Putz J. Organspende in Deutschland im Zeichen der neuen Gesetzgebung. Urologe. 2020;59:17–20. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00120-019-01092-w.

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Steenaart E, Crutzen R, de Vries NK. Beyond the ticked box: organ donation decision-making under different registration systems. Psychol Health. 2021;36:511–28. https://doi.org/10.1080/08870446.2020.1811867.

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Fehring Z, Boehme P, Wirth S, Fehring L. Die neue Gesetzgebung zur Organspende – Wirkung, Potenzial und Grenzen aus der Sicht klinisch tätiger Ärzt:innen. [New German laws on organ donation-clinicians’ perspectives on effects, potential and limitations]. Urologe A. 2021;60:1570–8.

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Statista. https://de.statista.com/statistik/daten/studie/167383/umfrage/arztbesuch-haeufigkeit-in-den-letzten-12-monaten-nach-alter/. Accessed 21 Feb 2022.

  • Callahan EJ, Stange KC, Zyzanski SJ, Goodwin MA, Flocke SA, Bertakis KD. Physician-elder interaction in community family practice. J Am Board Fam Pract. 2004;17:19–25. https://doi.org/10.3122/jabfm.17.1.19.

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Smailhodzic E, Hooijsma W, Boonstra A, Langley DJ. Social media use in healthcare: a systematic review of effects on patients and on their relationship with healthcare professionals. BMC Health Serv Res. 2016;16:442. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-016-1691-0.

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Schillinger D, Chittamuru D, Ramírez AS. From “Infodemics” to health promotion: a novel framework for the role of social media in public health. Am J Public Health. 2020;110:1393–6. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2020.305746.

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Abbasi RA, Maqbool O, Mushtaq M, Aljohani NR, Daud A, Alowibdi JS, Shahzad B. Saving lives using social media: analysis of the role of twitter for personal blood donation requests and dissemination. Telematics Inform. 2018;35:892–912. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2017.01.010.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Henderson ML, Adler JT, van Pilsum Rasmussen SE, Thomas AG, Herron PD, Waldram MM, et al. How should social media be used in transplantation? a survey of the American society of transplant surgeons. Transplantation. 2019;103:573–80. https://doi.org/10.1097/TP.0000000000002243.

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Warner-Søderholm G, Bertsch A, Søderholm A. Data on social media use related to age, gender and trust constructs of integrity, competence, concern, benevolence and identification. Data Brief. 2018;18:696–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dib.2018.03.065.

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Danielle G. Relationship, trust and crisis communication on social media with millennials and generation Z. Diss: Kansas State University; 2017.


    Google Scholar
     

  • Hausmann JS, Touloumtzis C, White MT, Colbert JA, Gooding HC. Adolescent and young adult use of social media for health and its implications. J Adolesc Health. 2017;60:714–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2016.12.025.

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Average Time Spent Daily on Social Media. https://www.broadbandsearch.net/blog/average-daily-time-on-social-media. Accessed 31 May 2022.

  • Hawn C. Take two aspirin and tweet me in the morning: how Twitter, Facebook, and other social media are reshaping health care. Health Aff (Millwood). 2009;28:361–8. https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.28.2.361.

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Iankova S, Davies I, Archer-Brown C, Marder B, Yau A. A comparison of social media marketing between B2B, B2C and mixed business models. Ind Mark Manage. 2019;81:169–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2018.01.001.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Felix R, Rauschnabel PA, Hinsch C. Elements of strategic social media marketing: a holistic framework. J Bus Res. 2017;70:118–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.05.001.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Pletikosa Cvijikj I, Michahelles F. Online engagement factors on Facebook brand pages. Soc Netw Anal Min. 2013;3:843–61. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13278-013-0098-8.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Lee J, Hong IB. Predicting positive user responses to social media advertising: The roles of emotional appeal, informativeness, and creativity. Int J Inf Manage. 2016;36:360–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2016.01.001.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Schreiner M, Fischer T, Riedl R. Impact of content characteristics and emotion on behavioral engagement in social media: literature review and research agenda. Electron Commer Res. 2021;21:329–45. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10660-019-09353-8.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Cadet FT, Aaltonen PG, Kavota V. The advertisement value of transformational & informational appeal on company Facebook pages. Mark Manage J. 2017;27(2):116–30.


    Google Scholar
     

  • Albers-Miller ND, Stafford MR. An international analysis of emotional and rational appeals in services vs goods advertising. J Consum Mark  1999;16(1):42–57.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Bakalash T, Riemer H. Exploring ad-elicited emotional arousal and memory for the ad using fMRI. J Advert. 2013;42:275–91. https://doi.org/10.1080/00913367.2013.768065.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Johar JS, Sirgy MJ. Value-expressive versus utilitarian advertising appeals: when and why to use which appeal. J Advert. 1991;20:23–33.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Lu J, Liu Z, Fang Z. Hedonic products for you, utilitarian products for me. Judgm Decis. 2016;11(4):332–41.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Kivetz R, Simonson I. Earning the right to indulge: effort as a determinant of customer preferences toward frequency program rewards. J Mark Res. 2002;39:155–70. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkr.39.2.155.19084.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Ben Natan M, Gorkov L. Investigating the factors affecting blood donation among Israelis. Int Emerg Nurs. 2011;19:37–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ienj.2010.01.003.

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Morris J, Holt J. Applying utilitarianism to the presumed consent system for organ donation to consider the moral pros and cons. British journal of nursing. 2021;30(19):1127–31.

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Harel I, Kogut T, Pinchas M, Slovic P. Effect of media presentations on willingness to commit to organ donation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2017;114:5159–64. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1703020114.

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • D’Alessandro AM, Peltier JW, Dahl AJ. Use of social media and college student organizations to increase support for organ donation and advocacy: a case report. Prog Transplant. 2012;22:436–41. https://doi.org/10.7182/pit2012920.

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Myrick JG. Identification and emotions experienced after a celebrity cancer death shape information sharing and prosocial behavior. J Health Commun. 2017;22:515–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/10810730.2017.1315622.

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Terbonssen T, Settmacher U, Wurst C, Dirsch O, Dahmen U. Effectiveness of organ donation information campaigns in germany: a facebook based online survey. Interact J Med Res. 2015;4:e16.

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Harel I, Kogut T. The Effect of the number and identification of recipients on organ-donation decisions. Front Psychol. 2021;12:794422.

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Jiang X, Jiang W, Cai J, Su Q, Zhou Z, He L, Lai K. Characterizing media content and effects of organ donation on a social media platform: content analysis. J Med Internet Res. 2019;21:e13058.

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Hansen SL, Pfaller L, Schicktanz S. Critical analysis of communication strategies in public health promotion: an empirical-ethical study on organ donation in Germany. Bioethics. 2021;35:161–72. https://doi.org/10.1111/bioe.12774.

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Hay M, Donnelly A. Encouraging organ donation in the antipodes: the impact of a high profile “celebrity organ donation on organ donation registration in Australia. Annual Conference of the European Health Psychology Society. 2005. https://doi.org/10.1080/14768320500221275.

  • Randhawa G. Organ donation and transplantation – public policy and clinical perspectives, BoD–Books on demand. 2012. p. 191–216.

  • Röck D, Petersen P, Yoeruek E, Thaler S, Bartz-Schmidt KU, Röck T. Effect of organ scandal on corneal donation rate and organ donors at a German University Hospital. Ann Transplant. 2017;22:425–30.

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Ruck JM, Henderson ML, Eno AK, van Pilsum Rasmussen SE, DiBrito SR, Thomas AG, et al. Use of Twitter in communicating living solid organ donation information to the public: an exploratory study of living donors and transplant professionals. Clin Transplant. 2019;33:e13447.

    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • dos Santos SPL, Martínez GFC. Promoting organ donation on the Twitter platform: an exploratory analysis in Ecuador. Revista Ibérica de Sistemas e Tecnologias de Informação. 2020;E33:351–60.


    Google Scholar
     

  • Fung IC-H, Blankenship EB, Ahweyevu JO, Cooper LK, Duke CH, Carswell SL. Public health implications of image-based social media: a systematic review of instagram, pinterest, tumblr, and flickr. Perm J. 2020;24:18.307.

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Berg SH, O’Hara JK, Shortt MT, Thune H, Brønnick KK, Lungu DA, et al. Health authorities’ health risk communication with the public during pandemics: a rapid scoping review. BMC Public Health. 2021;21:1401. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-021-11468-3.

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Seltzer EK, Horst-Martz E, Lu M, Merchant RM. Public sentiment and discourse about Zika virus on Instagram. Public Health. 2017;150:170–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.puhe.2017.07.015.

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Moser A, Korstjens I. Series: Practical guidance to qualitative research. part 3: sampling, data collection and analysis. Eur J Gen Pract. 2018;24:9–18.

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Cherian R, Le G, Whall J, Gomez S, Sarkar U. Content shared on social media for national cancer survivors day 2018. PLoS One. 2020;15:e0226194.

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Heineman B, Jewell M, Moran M, Bradley K, Spitzer KA, Lindenauer PK. Content analysis of promotional material for asthma-related products and therapies on Instagram. Allergy Asthma Clin Immunol. 2021;17:26. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13223-021-00528-3.

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Gabarron E, Bradway M, Fernandez-Luque L, Chomutare T, Hansen AH, Wynn R, Årsand E. Social media for health promotion in diabetes: study protocol for a participatory public health intervention design. BMC Health Serv Res. 2018;18:414. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-018-3178-7.

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Carrotte ER, Prichard I, Lim MSC. “Fitspiration” on Social Media: a content analysis of gendered images. J Med Internet Res. 2017;19:e95.

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Lin X, Genest C, Banks DL, Molenberghs G, Scott DW, Wang J-L, editors. Lessons in biostatistic, present, and future of statistical science: Chapman and Hall/CRC; 2014. p. 359–72. https://doi.org/10.1201/b16720-37.

  • Dalkey N, Helmer O. An experimental application of the delphi method to the use of experts. Manage Sci. 1963;9(3):458–67.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Wahid RM, Wadud M. Social media marketing on instagram: when is the most effective posting timing? EPRA Int J Multidisip Res (IJMR). 2020:312–21. https://doi.org/10.36713/epra4834.

  • Gignac GE, Szodorai ET. Effect size guidelines for individual differences researchers. Personality Individ Differ. 2016;102:74–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2016.06.069.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Farsi D. Social media and health care, part I: literature review of social media use by health care providers. J Med Internet Res. 2021;23:e23205.

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Gregory GD, Munch JM, Peterson M. Attitude functions in consumer research: comparing value–attitude relations in individualist and collectivist cultures. J Bus Res. 2002;55:933–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0148-2963(01)00213-2.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Hofstede Geert. Cultural constraints in management theories. Acad Manag Perspect. 1993;7(1):81–94.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Schwartz SH. Universalism values and the inclusiveness of our moral universe. J Cross Cult Psychol. 2007;38:711–28. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022107308992.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Scandroglio B, Domínguez-Gil B, López JS, Valentín MO, Martín MJ, Coll E, et al. Analysis of the attitudes and motivations of the Spanish population towards organ donation after death. Transpl Int. 2011;24:158–66. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1432-2277.2010.01174.x.

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Oliver M, Ahmed A, Woywodt A. Donating in good faith or getting into trouble Religion and organ donation revisited. World J Transplant. 2012;2:69–73. https://doi.org/10.5500/wjt.v2.i5.69.

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Noar SM, Benac CN, Harris MS. Does tailoring matter? Meta-analytic review of tailored print health behavior change interventions. Psychol Bull. 2007;133:673–93. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.133.4.673.

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Tafesse W, Wien A. Using message strategy to drive consumer behavioral engagement on social media. JCM. 2018;35:241–53. https://doi.org/10.1108/JCM-08-2016-1905.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Berger J. What makes online content viral? Strateg Dir. 2012. https://doi.org/10.1108/sd.2012.05628haa.014.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Yuki T. What makes brands’ social content shareable on facebook? JAR. 2015;55:458–70. https://doi.org/10.2501/JAR-2015-026.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Houts PS, Doak CC, Doak LG, Loscalzo MJ. The role of pictures in improving health communication: a review of research on attention, comprehension, recall, and adherence. Patient Educ Couns. 2006;61:173–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2005.05.004.

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Delp C, Jones J. Communicating information to patients: the use of cartoon illustrations to improve comprehension of instructions. Acad Emerg Med. 1996;3:264–70. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1553-2712.1996.tb03431.x.

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Xiao L, Ding M. Just the faces: exploring the effects of facial features in print advertising. Mark Sci. 2014;33:338–52. https://doi.org/10.1287/mksc.2013.0837.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Cyr D, Head M, Larios H, Pan B. Exploring human images in website design: a multi-method approach. MIS quarterly. 2009:539–566.

  • Gao Y, Xie Z, Sun L, Xu C, Li D. Characteristics of and user engagement with antivaping posts on instagram: observational study. JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2021;7:e29600.

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Wakefield MA, Loken B, Hornik RC. Use of mass media campaigns to change health behaviour. Lancet. 2010;376:1261–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(10)60809-4.

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Kumar A, Bezawada R, Rishika R, Janakiraman R, Kannan PK. From social to sale: the effects of firm-generated content in social media on customer behavior. J Mark. 2016;80:7–25. https://doi.org/10.1509/jm.14.0249.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Rishika R, Kumar A, Janakiraman R, Bezawada R. The effect of customers’ social media participation on customer visit frequency and profitability: an empirical investigation. Inf Syst Res. 2013;24:108–27. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.1120.0460.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Anonymous. Figure 1: Exemplary organ donation post [https://www.instagram.com/p/CeY83PXM3XW/]. Accessed 28 Jun 2022.

  • Anonymous. Figure 2: Exemplary organ donation post [https://www.instagram.com/p/CaCRdaJsFK5/]. Accessed 28 Jun 2022.

  • Rooth C. Ovarian cancer: risk factors, treatment and management. Br J Nurs. 2013;22(17):23–30.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Elghazaly H. The first BGICC consensus and recommendations for breast cancer awareness, early detection and risk reduction in low-and middle-income countries and the MENA region. Int J Cancer. 2021;149(3):505–13.

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Bleyer A, Baines C, Miller AB. Impact of screening mammography on breast cancer mortality. Int J Cancer. 2016;138:2003–12. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijc.29925.

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Xu S, Markson C, Costello KL, Xing CY, Demissie K, Llanos AAM. Leveraging social media to promote public health knowledge: example of cancer awareness via twitter. JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2016;2:e17.

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Thackeray R, Burton SH, Giraud-Carrier C, Rollins S, Draper CR. Using Twitter for breast cancer prevention: an analysis of breast cancer awareness month. BMC Cancer. 2013;13:508. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2407-13-508.

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • news source

    You may also like

    About Us

    Welcome to Daily Transplant News, your trusted source for the latest updates, stories, and information on transplantation and organ donations. We are passionate about sharing the inspiring journeys, groundbreaking research, and invaluable resources surrounding the world of transplantation.

    About Us

    Welcome to Daily Transplant News, your trusted source for the latest updates, stories, and information on transplantation and organ donations. We are passionate about sharing the inspiring journeys, groundbreaking research, and invaluable resources surrounding the world of transplantation.

    Copyright ©️ 2024 Daily Transplant News | All rights reserved.